Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:04:59 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathias_K=F6rber?= <mathias@koerber.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: More partitions on a single slice?
Message-ID:  <20001112180459.P802@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <NEBBLGLDKLMMGKEMEFMFIEBKCDAA.mathias@koerber.org>; from mathias@koerber.org on Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 03:08:38PM %2B0800
References:  <20001112172152.M802@wantadilla.lemis.com> <NEBBLGLDKLMMGKEMEFMFIEBKCDAA.mathias@koerber.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 12 November 2000 at 15:08:38 +0800, Mathias Körber wrote:
>> The /home *hierarchy is* for users.  It doesn't have to be the same
>>as ...
>
> yes, but symlinking /usr/local to /home/local is ugly. It encroaches on
> the diskspace set aside for users own (personal) files.

That's a circular argument.  It only encroaches if you set aside
enough space for users' own (personal) files.  I'm advocating more
space.

>>> I like partitioning off this data to prevent eating others' (other
>>> users', applications' etc) space. If I use symlinks this happens more
>>> easily.
>>
>> That's what quotas are for.
>
> Quotas apply on a per user basis, not on a per-application basis.
> If I have several users working on the same application etc,
> I'd have to restrict them separately for this (and if the app
> lived on the same FS as eg /home, then I'd simultaneously
> restrict them in their /home, as quotas are only as granular as your
> filesystem).

This is possibly a valid counterargument.  Can you give a convincing
example?

>> Agreed, servers are a special case (and yes, I've seen laptop based
>> servers :-) In any such case, you need to consider exactly what you're
>> doing, based on actual and expected load amongst other things.
>
> But why then have this arbitrary restrictions in the first place?

They've been there forever.  I can't remember a UNIX which really
gives significantly more than 7 file system partitions.  System V has
a total of 15, but most of them are special purpose.  And I suppose
the general feeling is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001112180459.P802>