Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:15:27 +0100 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org> To: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Subject: Re: Our aging base system heimdal Message-ID: <AANLkTimWCsuKCTBCS5la4fGpM2v5Rh8_ZWDKOEzJfApE@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimSdNOfX7kKgjWwUXuuRGISMrtzQVhQINaCfTml@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTik213g_8W2ocr3mCCb2EED8RBXsYBavdYll1PI_@mail.gmail.com> <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <AANLkTimSdNOfX7kKgjWwUXuuRGISMrtzQVhQINaCfTml@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote: > Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized? > > My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API authenticated RPC which FreeBSD didn't support until recently. I added working RPCSEC_GSS to our userland RPC library in 2008 and it should be available in FreeBSD 8.x and later. In theory, if MIT actually document their protocol, it should be reasonably straightforward to support it. I doubt if I will be able to do the work either for this or for upgrading heimdal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimWCsuKCTBCS5la4fGpM2v5Rh8_ZWDKOEzJfApE>