Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:11:03 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network simulation using jails & vimage Message-ID: <9a542da31002230211k2fb5d99do7ed574a8cd94f4d9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B8169EB.4030100@elischer.org> References: <1266739527.25137.519.camel@localhost> <4B80F076.5020109@elischer.org> <20100221084118.W27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4B8169EB.4030100@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>wrote= : > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Jim Sifferle wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've used ipfw and Dummynet as well as ipfw + DSCP recognition patch a= nd >>>> pf/altq to simulate Internet and MPLS WAN environments for several >>>> years. All of my setups have run under VMWare, which for many reasons >>>> isn't ideal. I would like to collapse all of these VMs into one FreeB= SD >>>> box using jails and vimages. >>>> >>>> Does any FreeBSD branch / vimage release combination support separate = pf >>>> AND ipfw configurations per jail? I need ipfw+pf/altq for HFSC queuin= g >>>> to simulate the queueing effects of MPLS provider edge and core >>>> routers. >>>> >>> >>> -current (9) should be close, with patches for pf supplied by ceri. >>> >> >> s,ceri,eri, (Ermal Lu=E7i) >> > > err yeah.. > > it'd be nice if itcould get committed > > Ermal, is it ready? > > It is usable look at http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/eri/pf45/head/. For vnet pfsync/pflow/pflog needs some fixes still. > > >> >> 8 can do separate ipfw but pf is not changed. >>> 9 has bugs fixed. but I'm not sure if the changes for pf went in.. >>> they do exis tif they are not in already. >>> >> >> No, pf hasn't gone in yet; it lives in user/eri/pf45/ in svn and I am >> not sure what the plans are. >> >> Apart from the latest changes 8 and 9 should be pretty much in sync >> wrt to VIMAGE I think. >> >> >> I'm hoping the latest 7.2-STABLE-201001 snapshot will work. The DSCP >>>> recognition patch for ipfw that I rely on doesn't seem to work with >>>> 8.0. If 7.2 won't work for my needs, but 8 or 9-CURRENT will, is anyon= e >>>> aware >>>> of an updated ipfw DSCP patch? I haven't seen anything on Google or t= he >>>> freebsd-ipfw mailing list. >>>> >>> >>> what is DSCP? >>> >> >> I guess Differentiated Services CodePoint (if talking MPLS). >> >> >> /bz >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9a542da31002230211k2fb5d99do7ed574a8cd94f4d9>