Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:11:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: witness oddity
Message-ID:  <16706.6294.966077.389173@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200409101629.32653.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <16705.57806.550902.483858@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200409101450.47478.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <16706.309.398789.905433@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200409101629.32653.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

John Baldwin writes:
 > >
 > > Does witness know at the time that it emits the warning that its a
 > > "class" type of reversal, rather than a reversal based on previous
 > > observations?  If so, would it be possible to emit a warning saying
 > > something like "Holding a sleep mutex while acquiring an sx lock is
 > > probited by law" (maybe add " violators will be shot" for grins ;)
 > 
 > That's a possibility yes.
 > 

Thanks... I think that might be helpful..

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16706.6294.966077.389173>