Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:53:16 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <20020121155316.GD37234@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Patch attached. I already comment "always turning opie on" in previous message, besides that I don't understand one thing in your patch: why you not enable pam_opie for "su" and not add pam_opieaccess there? It is enough useful for sysadmin logging in as user via unencrypted telnet and then do "su" for root. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121155316.GD37234>