Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:52:21 -0700 From: Rumen Telbizov <telbizov@gmail.com> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table Message-ID: <CAENR%2B_X5KTdeb00f9NShN1YK%2BT2aY1vG5YcTCgu4aXZO=%2Bpa=g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <542AAA3C.1080803@ipfw.ru> References: <CAENR%2B_UVLDDrsef2W4CXCFX65EYaxeKN4MNWbgoyaZ5qDGe1Pg@mail.gmail.com> <542AAA3C.1080803@ipfw.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > > Can you show route -Arn output ? > # route -Arn route: illegal option -- A route: usage: route [-46dnqtv] command [[modifiers] args] Can you disable carp and see if this changes anything? > Unfortunately no. It is live and serving traffic. I will be rebuilding the backup to 10 as well and testing things today. Hopefully it will give me a bit more visibility. > # Enable better lacp/lagg transmit distribution >> net.link.lagg.default_use_flowid=0 >> > Are you sure this is really "better" ? > Absolutely. I have a lagg (lacp) interface between ix0 and ix1 and without this option outgoing traffic (transmits) were being sent only via one of the interfaces - ix0. With this option I have proper balancing on the outgoing traffic. Thank you, -- Rumen Telbizov Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAENR%2B_X5KTdeb00f9NShN1YK%2BT2aY1vG5YcTCgu4aXZO=%2Bpa=g>