Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:42:02 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        "Steven G. Kargl" <kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: standards/59797: Implement C99's round[f]() math fucntions
Message-ID:  <20031201173943.A4239@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311302330.hAUNUNkD090320@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200311302330.hAUNUNkD090320@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Steven G. Kargl wrote:

>  Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
>  > One suggestion: Could you make that
>  >
>  > +double
>  > +round(double x)
>  > +{
>  >
>  > to match style(9) and (most of) msun/src/*.c?
>
>  I'll submit a style(9) clean-up if the current
>  diff is committed.  If you look through msun,
>  you'll see all sorts of sytle(9) violations.

That's because msun is not written in KNF.  Conformance to KNF would
be style(9) non-conformance, since the meta rule about using the same
style as the existing code has precedence.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201173943.A4239>