Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:37:22 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gconf schemas + .desktop file question Message-ID: <20111216123722.GA63869@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20111216121009.GA57825@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20111209184403.GA17862@regency.nsu.ru> <4EE296DA.60409@freebsd.org> <20111215122654.GA3380@regency.nsu.ru> <4EEA384A.70802@freebsd.org> <20111216103716.GA39744@regency.nsu.ru> <4EEB2B40.3080005@passap.ru> <20111216121009.GA57825@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:10:09PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:28:00PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > ...and three last lines imho should be considered to use %%X11%% > > (or like) instead of %%GNOME%%. The desktop database is not > > a gnome-only essence. As for me I use fluxbox with fbpanel > > and desktop files are used as well. > > Yes, I understand. The problem with this port that *both* .desktop file > and GConf2 schemas are installed when port configured with --enable-mime, > and I don't really want to "fix" and thus inevitably complicate this > logic. On the second thought (and look), I guess I can install .desktop file unconditionally without simple hack. I will send another diff for review. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111216123722.GA63869>