Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:09:41 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_subr.c uipc_mbuf.cuipc_syscalls.c src/sys/sys uio.h Message-ID: <20040201220357.C7383@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <opr2pjtpkk8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> References: <200402010756.i117uiWm094818@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040201140055.C3097@odysseus.silby.com> <opr2pjtpkk8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > (Hopefully once we enable threading support in apache2 it will go > > faster... hopefully.) > > Have one of you tried AppWeb[1] yet? I learned about it from the > Slashdot[2] and it claimed that it outperforms Apache that can deliver > about 3.5K pages per second on a Pentium-class system. > > [1] http://www.mbedthis.com > [2] > http://apache.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/27/2210229&mode=thread&tid=148&tid=185 > > Cheers, > Mezz There are plenty of webservers that are faster than Apache... the problem is, they are not Apache! I'm interested in Apache performance because it's the most common webserver out there, and is what most FreeBSD servers run. So, any increase in Apache performance benefits a large number of people. Anyway, I suspect that thttpd performs as well or better than AppWeb, so I'm not too interested in taking a look at it. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040201220357.C7383>