Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:02:02 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org>, <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, <behanna@zbzoom.net>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: access() is a security hole? Message-ID: <20021012175752.K16055-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20021012031120.GA1951@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, David Schultz wrote: > ... > Really, there ought to be a version of the open syscall that takes > an argument specifying the credentials to use for the call, but > instead we're stuck with the lovely setuid suite of functions. Unmentionablux has had the setfsuid suite for some time now. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021012175752.K16055-100000>