Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:41:21 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDB_TRACE and no backend Message-ID: <4C9507D1.3010008@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingR6k6xdQJ3cZH8EkJeCWnq5vzeEjGHNaDv8AT@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C94A138.8050905@icyb.net.ua> <AANLkTingR6k6xdQJ3cZH8EkJeCWnq5vzeEjGHNaDv8AT@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 18/09/2010 21:26 Attilio Rao said the following: > > You have to eventually wrap this logic within the 'STACK' option > (opt_stack.h for the check) because stack_save() will be uneffective > otherwise. STACK should be mandatory for DDB I guess, but it is not > for KDB. Thank you for the tip! BTW, why is this under an option? It seems like something like this won't add much to kernel size and won't affect performance at all. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C9507D1.3010008>