Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:30:44 -0700 From: Justin Teller <justin.teller@gmail.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Subject: Re: Signals and an exiting thread Message-ID: <c47019cc0910051530l65ad9535qd4344cff0d8448f4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091005192144.GA2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <c47019cc0909301102y189a0b8aq47d23efae549f4ab@mail.gmail.com> <20091001120730.GR3130@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20091002201213.GA16633@stack.nl> <20091005192144.GA2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/10/5 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>: -- snip -- > > I agree that postponing assignment of the thread for signal delivery > till the actual delivery occurs is the proper fix. I tried to cheat > in my previous patch. Below is an experimental change that did very > minimal testing. > -- snip diff -- I like where you're going with the patch. I'll test it out as well and let you know what I find. Thanks! -Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c47019cc0910051530l65ad9535qd4344cff0d8448f4>