Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:52:37 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030105125030.02936e30@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030105192556.GA526@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0@localhost> <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030105074923.GA4956@papagena.rockefeller.edu> <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:25 PM 1/5/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >You did say you were interested in heavily nested loops and floating >point arithmetic. Sparse matrix operations qualify. But using whose algorithms and libraries? We didn't test sparse matrix algorithms because that's not what our code was designed to do. >It is interesting, in fact, that gcc does well in all such problems. Again, using whose code? We consistently found that on ours, Intel was better. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030105125030.02936e30>