Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:14:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patent hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011512350.3256@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <loom.20120801T144931-391@post.gmane.org> References: <loom.20120801T135633-743@post.gmane.org> <BAY165-ds10BF4FBB113F9509503998CAC40@phx.gbl> <loom.20120801T144931-391@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is a scan of ports with "linux" keyword: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=linux&stype=all > It looks somewhat silly to have to rely on those "Linux-whatever" things to be > a functional FreeBSD OS ... still you are talking on ports. In what base system rely on linux? > It made a first imporant step with clang/clang++ and associated libc/c++ to > counter GPL trickery; there could be done much more to eliminate Linux-based > software. #cd /usr/src/gnu/ #ls usr.bin lib lib: Makefile csu libgcc libgomp libreadline libssp libsupc++ Makefile.inc libdialog libgcov libodialog libregex libstdc++ usr.bin: Makefile cc diff gdb groff sdiff texinfo Makefile.inc cvs diff3 gperf patch send-pr binutils dialog dtc grep rcs sort on my clang-free FreeBSD 9 system. do not exaggerate. clang move is already too early and IMHO wrong.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011512350.3256>