Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:11:40 +0300 From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -R order Message-ID: <6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it> References: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: > Hello. > I have a question about the order in which portupgrade -R handles ports. > > > > If I issue: > portupgrade -R it-openoffice.org > > it will upgrade openoffice.org, *then* gcc43. > > I would guess openoffice.org requires gcc43 to build, but then, shouldn't it > be handled *before*? Whether OOo requires gcc-4.3 indeed? Not "customized" version of gcc-3.4 (ooo-gcc if I recall correctly...)? About another ports: the was majority of prorts doen't require any specific GCC version supplied in ports, but use system-default gcc instead (/usr/bin/gcc), therefore, order of building gcc-4.3 from ports is irrelevant. -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc>