Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:14:24 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r214647 - in projects/binutils-2.17: sys/boot/i386/efi sys/conf usr.sbin/ndiscvt Message-ID: <20101102081424.GA57515@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201011012020.oA1KKVq5087117@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201011012020.oA1KKVq5087117@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:20:31PM +0000, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Author: dim > Date: Mon Nov 1 20:20:31 2010 > New Revision: 214647 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214647 > > Log: > Use new output format 'elf64-x86-64-freebsd' instead of 'elf64-x86-64', > and similarly 'elf64-sparc-freebsd' instead of 'elf64-sparc'. is there any reason why we do this? this effectively prevents 3rd party compilers (their driver) from working out of the box on freebsd.. as they expect the format to be elfX-FOO wihtout the -freebsd suffix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101102081424.GA57515>