Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:13:39 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <200704091613.46291.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200704090359.30493.max@love2party.net> References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070409010703.GA74547@garage.freebsd.pl> <200704090359.30493.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1646430.lqxkHg5yHB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 09 April 2007 03:59, Max Laier wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007 03:07, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:53:12PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: =2E.. > > > I'm quite tired of tracking such problems, because our mechanism > > > for detecting already initialized locks is too simple (based on one > > > bit), so I'd prefer to improve it, or just add bzero() to > > > mutex_init(). > > > > I just committed a fix. Now I do 13 bits check for already > > initialized locks detection instead of standard 1 bit check. Could > > you repeat your test? > > Will do tomorrow. Thanks. Confirmed to work for my testcase. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1646430.lqxkHg5yHB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGGkoaXyyEoT62BG0RAhaaAJ0U5bX66g+pXma4Dern9RkHX1R62wCeOr3f LaklXni4/XbyJW64gWguUtk= =wNGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1646430.lqxkHg5yHB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704091613.46291.max>