Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:48:08 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: page fault in sched_pin() Message-ID: <p06002000bd68ce277bb4@[10.0.1.3]> In-Reply-To: <4142D648.5040605@elischer.org> References: <200409110959.i8B9xj01048328@gw.catspoiler.org> <4142D648.5040605@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 3:41 AM -0700 2004-09-11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I am not sure why this appeared to work on my system. My only thought is that
> I wasn't booting off the kernel I thught I was booting off. There was a big
> rush to get it in before scott changed the name.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but we're in freeze for RELENG_5
preparing for it to become the new -STABLE branch, right? Should not
this change have been made only to HEAD, and then merged to RELENG_5
if it was found to be necessary? Assuming that's the case, then why
the rush?
I'm just curious as to how a mistake like this could have made it
into both -HEAD and RELENG_5 simultaneously....
--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002000bd68ce277bb4>