Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:01:38 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/papi Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message Message-ID: <20070618170138.GA73856@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070618160706.GA53313@fatpipi.cirx.org> References: <200706181421.l5IEL76Q021707@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070618155933.GA73067@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070618160706.GA53313@fatpipi.cirx.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:07:06AM +0800, Vanilla I. Shu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:59:33AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:21:07PM +0000, Vanilla I. Shu wrote: > > Build fixes should not get version bumps, this was a NOP change for > > those who already managed to build it. > Well, maintainer reroll the distfile, so I think it should bump version. =46rom what the maintainer told me it was just a fix to remove an unnecessary check that was causing the configure script to fail. Presumably you also verified this yourself by checking the diff. If not, you were supposed to. If so, then it clearly falls under the cases in which portrevision should not be bumped. In particular rerolling the distfile does not automatically require a bump. Kris --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdrpyWry0BWjoQKURAv+eAKCLxMvAexqJYNUlr+Ma+gdOGljIPwCfQTXP UpuJOeafd2iFEGh7Vzybn14= =Jq05 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070618170138.GA73856>