Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      20 Jan 2002 21:01:26 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        markm@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Step4, pam_opie getpwnam check fix for review
Message-ID:  <xzp7kqc4wrt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20020120194510.GA24069@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <20020120194510.GA24069@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes:
> Bug: 
> getpwnum() (or getlogin() in earlier stage) may return NULL under
> various complex circumstanes, but following code not expect it and may
> cause NULL pointer reference and core dump.
> 
> Fix:
> Add check for NULL and return PAM_AUTH_ERR

Approved (unless Mark objects).

Strictly speaking, I think getlogin() should be replaced with the
result of pam_get_item(PAM_RUSER), but that's separate issue.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7kqc4wrt.fsf>