Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:40:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Ilya A. Arkhipov" <micro@heavennet.ru>, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>, kwm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenTTD Message-ID: <20110622154007.GA14515@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik_4Zqv9uyuLCtRFuDQaF=8%2BoMk1A@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110621214013.6cc4760e@heavennet.ru> <20110622020048.GA83940@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTi=En%2B7nJgEmKCmBEQMwiV0nbcPhEg@mail.gmail.com> <20110622064224.GB94185@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTi=s6zYOJJv6%2Bkk%2Bttd7jadmTuaT6w@mail.gmail.com> <20110622160233.8b6156e1.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTik_4Zqv9uyuLCtRFuDQaF=8%2BoMk1A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > Just to satisfy a nagging question inside me (I'm sorry, you're going > to regret having me around!). > > Do you mean: > > BUILD_DEPENDS > LIB_DEPENDS > RUN_DEPENDS > USE_FOO > USE_BAR > > or > > BUILD_DEPENDS > LIB_DEPENDS > RUN_DEPENDS > > USE_FOO > USE_BAR > > ? > > Apart from the aesthetics appeal of the latter, I also think that > there should be a distinction between the USE and DEPENDS -- only USE > sets cool variables for the Makefile to then use... Of course the latter. See any port that I matinain or had recently touched. ;-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110622154007.GA14515>