Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:29:57 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...) Message-ID: <20020212021145.CA6789F10A@okeeffe.bestweb.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:11:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > I believe, what I see. And that is, FreeBSD includes both -- gdb and > > gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And I want to be able to use that > > same libbfd for my own development and for porting of other compilers > > and tools. ... > Sure some things are a problem. GCC 2.95 generates bad optimized code on > the Alpha. Upgrading to 3.1 will fix [some of] this. We cannot do a To satisfy a bit of my curiosity: - is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated code goes? Or is that what you mean by "bad optimised code" ? - The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than on x86. Do you have any idea how gcc3 does in this respect? Thanks! Wilko -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212021145.CA6789F10A>