Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:23:40 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: status report on ports and clang Message-ID: <20120106002340.GA29467@lonesome.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As of early December, I have been able to get FreeBSD's secondary ports cluster (pointyhat-west.isc.FreeBSD.org) to the point where it is able to more quickly build the entire ports tree with clang as the default compiler. You can see the current state here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang It includes a link to the most recent run on amd64-9: http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp-clang.20111218074840.pointyhat-west/index-reason.html You can see that on that run, 18256 packages were built (out of 22938 in INDEX), and there were 1208 errors. For comparison, a recent similar (but not exact) amd64-9 run on the original pointyhat resulted in 21154 packages and 15 errors. Under the heading #Known_port_problems, I haved listed the broken ports that have the largest number of ports depending on them. IMHO fixing these should be the highest priority, as they will unblock around 1000 other ports when they are fixed. Now that we have these results, and will be updating them regularly, it's less necessary to send PRs noting that port XYZ doesn't build on clang. However, PRs with patches are always welcomed :-) Thanks. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120106002340.GA29467>