Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:51:32 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
To:        Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cy <cy@freebsd.org>, pav@freebsd.org, xfce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1 failed on amd64 9]
Message-ID:  <201111050251.pA52pWa3003489@slippy.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> of "Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:09:14 BST." <4EB4709A.9050502@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4EB4709A.9050502=40freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan writes:
> On 04-11-2011 23:18, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > -------- P=F8eposlan=E1 zpr=E1va --------
> >> Od: User Ports-amd64 <ports-amd64=40freebsd.org>
> >> Komu: cvs=40oook.cz, itetcu=40freebsd.org, florent.thoumie=40gmail.c=
om
> >> P=F8edm=ECt: xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1 failed on amd64 9
> >> Datum: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:52 GMT
> >>
> >> You can also find this build log at
> >>
> >>   http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.9.2011110=
312291
> 4/xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1.log
> >>
> =5B.. snip log..=5D
>=20
> It builds fine on my tinderbox (7-9 i386-gcc, 10-i386-clang):
> http://rene-ladan.nl:8080/tb/index.php?action=3Ddescribe_port&id=3D575
>=20
> and builds/runs fine on my 9-amd64-clang laptop.
> Ren=E9

I know what the problem is.

=23if defined(__FreeBSD_version) && __FreeBSD_version >=3D 900044

What is __FreeBSD_version on the package build machine? This should be se=
t=20
to something more reasonable than the latest 9.0. When did MAXLSLP get=20
moved to sys/vumeter.h>?


--=20
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert=40komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy=40FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201111050251.pA52pWa3003489>