Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:14:57 +0200
From:      "John W. Kitz" <John.Kitz@xs4all.nl>
To:        <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD distribution for ARM processors.
Message-ID:  <000901ced0c3$6bf791b0$43e6b510$@Kitz@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <44bo2ekdj8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <001d01ced02e$aaf29260$00d7b720$@Kitz@xs4all.nl> <44bo2ekdj8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gilbert,

Thanks. Do you expect this current position to change in the near future?

The reason I'm asking is the fact that I get the impression that there may
be developments in the area of hardware development such as the cubietruck
(see
http://cubieboard.org/2013/09/14/cubietruck-is-put-into-trial-production/)
which move ARM based systems closer to general purpose platforms based on
architectures such as i386, AMD, SPARC, etc. and which might warrant such a
change provided that it is feasible from a perspective of distribution
packaging of course.

Regards, Jk.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org] 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:24 PM
To: John.Kitz@xs4all.nl
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD distribution for ARM processors.

"John W. Kitz" <John.Kitz@xs4all.nl> writes:

> Can someone please explain the rationale behind not providing a 
> distribution for arm based systems, as it seems somewhat illogical to 
> me that distributions are available for ia64, powerpc, sparc64 (see
> http://www.freebsd.org/where.html) which are considered Tier 2 
> architectures while the official reason for arm being a Tier 2 
> architecture is the fact that no distribution is provided for it (see 
> http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/arm.html).

The ARM port is mostly used for embedded work, for which a formal
distribution would not be helpful. There really aren't many standards for
peripherals beyond i2c, so it wouldn't be possible to support different
ARM-based devices with a single distribution.

Be well.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000901ced0c3$6bf791b0$43e6b510$>