Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:06:25 +1000 From: Tony Landells <ahl@austclear.com.au> To: Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: distributed natd Message-ID: <200108122306.JAA21903@tungsten.austclear.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net> of "Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:50:33 %2B0100." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108121042260.13034-100000@elm.phenome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
joshua@roughtrade.net said: > If you want to do failover between two NAT gateways, you can avoid > reinventing much of the high-availability wheel with the net/vrrp port > and taking things from there. VRRP was defined specifically to support > router failover. Perhaps you can piggyback state onto the > advertisements? Last time I checked on VRRP, it was in a questionable legal state due to protests by Cisco that it (sort of) infringed on HSRP--has that changed? I don't really want to build a solution on technology that may get yanked suddenly... Tony -- Tony Landells <ahl@austclear.com.au> Senior Network Engineer Ph: +61 3 9677 9319 Australian Clearing Services Pty Ltd Fax: +61 3 9677 9355 Level 4, Rialto North Tower 525 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108122306.JAA21903>