Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:54:56 +0100
From:      Bartosz Stec <admin@kkip.pl>
To:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Will XFS be adopted
Message-ID:  <4923D460.5020900@kkip.pl>
In-Reply-To: <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org>	<20081109184349.GG51239@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<4920D879.3070806@jrv.org> <20081117050441.GA16855@ourbrains.org>	<20081118175210.GA3753@hyperion.scode.org>	<20081119001742.GA21835@ourbrains.org> <49235D86.4050106@modulus.org> <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav pisze:
> Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> writes:
>   
>> [...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into
>> the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server.
>>     
>
> ZFS has been in 7 for over a year.
>
> DES
>   
Yes, it's in STABLE, however zfs module says:

    This module (opensolaris) contains code covered by the
    Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL)
    see http://opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/
    *WARNING: ZFS is considered to be an experimental feature in FreeBSD.*

So ZFS in 7.X should not be considered as STABLE for now.

-- 
Bartosz Stec

AUXILIA Spółka z o.o.
ul. Wałbrzyska 43/2
52-314 Wrocław
tel. (71) 79 99 760 w. 69
GSM: 662171775
E-Mail: admin@kkip.pl






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4923D460.5020900>