Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 09:38:27 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Ladavac Marino <mladavac@metropolitan.at> Cc: "'Joe Abley'" <jabley@clear.co.nz>, John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding desktop support Message-ID: <3727AA03.AA84571E@newsguy.com> References: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C11002761795F3@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ladavac Marino wrote: > > [ML] Well, it sounds like MacOS, or OS/2 with their structured > files. It sounds like Windows, too. But these capabilities are not bad > (in fact, a colleague of mine has been recently complaining about > missing desktop support under X11--he is a OS/2 fan). Until ELF, UNIX > didn't really have support for structured executables; now it does, this Sure it did. FS layers. And they work for all kinds of files, not only executables. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness if that _none_ of his predictions have come true yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3727AA03.AA84571E>