Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:42:39 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Makoto MATSUSHITA <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why 'lnc.ko' instead of 'if_lnc.ko' ? 
Message-ID:  <200012210142.SAA13073@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 10:26:12 %2B0900." <20001221102612F.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> 
References:  <20001221102612F.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>  <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200012201805.eBKI5is41536@billy-club.village.org> <200012201942.MAA10802@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001221102612F.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Makoto MATSUSHITA writes:
: Hmm, fixing these are beyond my skill...

I'll go ahead and fix it, or make sure it does.

: BTW, are there anybody working on 'pcn' (yet another lance driver) to
: work with VMware ? Current 5-current installation floppy makes VMware
: panic (caution: FreeBSD doesn't panic), and it is maybe caused by pcn
: driver when it knocks VMware pseudo ethernet device in 32bit mode.
: Note that FreeBSD 4-stable works well with VMware, so maybe there are
: hints in the differences between 4-stable and 5-current.

Can't help you on that.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012210142.SAA13073>