Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:10:39 +0100
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Ed Maste <emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca>, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>, JINMEI Tatuya / =?utf-8?q?=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Subject:   Re: inet_pton and oddly-formatted addresses
Message-ID:  <200701210610.49958.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <y7vmz4dm7tn.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
References:  <20070120192807.GA1326@sandvine.com> <20070120214052.U82671@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <y7vmz4dm7tn.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1462050.20htLLDccN
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 21 January 2007 03:28, JINMEI Tatuya / =E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=
=94=E5=93=89 wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:42:44 +0000 (UTC),
> >>>>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> said:
>
> emaste> I think an address like 1.002.3.4 is bizarre, but is our
> inet_pton incorrect emaste> in rejecting it?
>
> >> The change was taken from BIND9.  The following is from BIND9's
> >> CHANGES:
> >>
> >> 935.	[bug]		inet_pton failed to reject leading zeros.
> >
> > well, maybe they were wrong? How does one get in contact with their
> > bugs database these days? Is comp.protocols.dns.bind still a good
> > place to discuss these things?
>
> Or bind-users@isc.org.  And yes, I'd ask the question at some
> BIND-specific list.
>
> 					JINMEI, Tatuya
> 					Communication Platform Lab.
> 					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
> 					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
>
> p.s. 1.002.3.4 is "illegal" according to RFC3986, Section 3.2.2
> (although it's specified in the context of a URI), so "what is legal"
> is probably a controversial issue.

Section 7.4 is rather clear about the scope of the definition of "dotted=20
notation" in 3.2.2. - i.e. it is limited to URIs. inet_aton gethostbyname=20
etc. are explicitly allowed to accept platform dependent representations.

=2D-=20
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart1462050.20htLLDccN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBFsvXZXyyEoT62BG0RAh/2AJ0RqT8TCimmwZ9f1eTjGO0tOmHUggCeNqMb
/HTYhr5Dj7c8NrNC2p2+qLU=
=jGYx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1462050.20htLLDccN--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701210610.49958.max>