Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:22:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the incredible shrinking socket Message-ID: <20020707192134.T15265-100000@patrocles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20020707195321.GN97638@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Possibly, but the additional pointer dereference would be expensive > and a lot of code would have to change without the compatibility > macros. > > I sort of did it as a proof of concept, but of course since it doesn't > completely work I haven't proved it. :) > > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Well, if it's not working I wouldn't worry too much about it. A TIME_WAIT cache or socket buffer autosizing would probably save a lot more memory. :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020707192134.T15265-100000>