Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:05:44 +0900 (JST) From: hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) To: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Cc: mike@smith.net.au, walter@fortean.com, am@amsoft.ru, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: APM power off (patch) Message-ID: <199803100205.LAA18980@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:32:57 %2B0900". <199803100132.KAA24025@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199803100132.KAA24025@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp writes: >> It means that we had better formulate a framework in which both can be >> implemented and work in a standardized manner, right? -current has already had APM power-off feature. I've also implemented it in extended at_shutdown() manner for PAO, but -current uses i386/machdep.c. I think both implementations are reasonable, so I have no plan to replace -current code with mine or something else. Sorry. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi Network Technology Center Keio University hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803100205.LAA18980>