Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:15:57 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 Message-ID: <083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8@inethouston.net> References: <080e01c0cc84$0e693860$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424090458.A22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's true, but some people expressed concern for those who wanted to stick with 2.0.8 and just have samba20 and samba22 in the ports. Either way is fine for me just as long as samba-devel doesn't stay that way forever. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:04 AM Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:01:51AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > Just a reminder to whomever takes care of this to rename samba-devel to > > samba22 since it isn't alpha anymore. > > I don't really know if samba22 is a good name.. Isn't it supposed to > be just 'samba' now that it is the 'official' branch? > > G'luck, > Peter > > -- > Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8>