Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: net@freebsd.org Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: virtually contig jumbo mbufs (was Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot) Message-ID: <200207052050.g65KoUVY004018@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <20020619090046.A2063@panzer.kdm.org> <15653.62134.521004.349089@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200207051937.g65Jb6rm003934@vashon.polstra.com> <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> wrote: > > Without the docs it would take a lot of trial & error to > > figure out how to make it work. > > Not necessarily. It just looked at the struct def. To me, it looks > *exactly* like the equivalent tigon-2 struct. This makes sense, as > its a descendant of the tigon-2. Are the tigon-2 docs publicly available and free from NDA concerns? John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207052050.g65KoUVY004018>