Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:31:18 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: Andy Sparrow <spadger@best.com> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, "P.A.Osborne" <P.A.Osborne@ukc.ac.uk>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ThinkPad R31 - Lucent windmodem woes.... Message-ID: <20021126173118.2022F5D07@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:56:34 PST." <20021126025634.24C6A27F@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:56:34 -0800 > From: Andy Sparrow <spadger@best.com> > > --==_Exmh_1667885680P > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > I believe IBM is now using the ICH3 chipset which includes the Agre > > (nee Lucent) AC'97 WinModem. This is a different beast from the older > > Lucent WinModems and, unless something has recently changed, it is not > > supported under FreeBSD with the ltmdm port. > > Yup, what he said... > > > FWIW, under Windows, the new modem is vastly superior to my older > > internal modem on my 600E. > > Huh? I was under the impression that all the 600E's had an mWave[0] > part? Or was that just some of them? > > (Model identification is all very well, until the spec varies wildly > over the production run, doncha think?) Yes, the 600E is an mWave. I was not comparing the Agre AC'97 modem to the older Lucent modems, just to my previous DSP-as-modem experience. (I'm the maintainer for the mWave modem port but don't use it any more except for testing as I now have a T30.) Sorry to hear that you got stuck with an mWave ISDN part. I didn't know such a thing existed. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021126173118.2022F5D07>