Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:52 +0200 From: "V.Chukharev" <chukharev@mail.ru> To: "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net>, "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, cognet@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwi leaks memory? Message-ID: <op.tnyese110g54sc@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200702181620.26610.max@love2party.net> References: <op.tns7i21z0g54sc@localhost> <200702161738.35142.max@love2party.net> <20070216085132.A7944@xorpc.icir.org> <200702181620.26610.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:20:18 +0200, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote: > The linux driver uses one continuous buffer as well. I tried to hand in > separate buffers, but it failed to initialize the firmware. Attached is > a diff (for HEAD and RELENG_6) to allocate the DMA buffer once and keep > it around. As I said earlier: As long as the firmware is as (un)stable > as it is now, this might be the only sensible way. All in all it's not > that bad, as we "only" throw away 212966 bytes. > > Could you please confirm that this works for you? Sorry, I cannot apply the patch. The versions seem to be correct. I even tried both patches... Regards, -- V. Chukharev
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tnyese110g54sc>