Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:25:35 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, kirk@mckusick.com
Subject:   Re: fsck pass sanitizing patch 
Message-ID:  <95544.985793135@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:05:09 MDT." <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103280831001.8533-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103280831001.8533-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>, Chr
is Dillon writes:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>         There is no way to tell it that ccd0c overlaps ad0 and ad1.
>>
>>         With the patch, it will do it this way:
>>
>>         pass 2:
>>         One process doing ad0s1e
>>         One process doing ad1s1e and ad1s1f
>>
>>         and when they are complete:
>>
>>         pass 11:
>>         One process doing ccd0c
>
>I've always assigned a ccd (this would apply to Vinum volumes as well,
>I'd think) a pass number of 1.

Pass number 1 in magic in that it is sequential.  Traditional
wisdom (or lack thereoff) have only put rootfs in pass 1.

Until my patch, pass 1 would certainly be better for ccd
than pass > 1.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95544.985793135>