Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:30:16 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801 Message-ID: <20050620173016.GB93634@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050620094835.Q19830@fledge.watson.org> References: <20050619155228.Y6413@fledge.watson.org> <66959.1119209763@critter.freebsd.dk> <m2br613i8n.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <p0621021dbedbfa4dd5ff@[128.113.24.47]> <20050620094835.Q19830@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:58:46AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > - Try to figure out how to better differentiate build vs. install time > frobbing. For example, the NanoBSD NO_CXX concern: we want C++ > applications, we just don't want to install the build chain. > Currently, we have no way to differentiate these concepts, since our > dependencies are entirely build-time, and our frobs have to match up > (generally) between build and install. I.e., devd is built only if > !NO_CXX, which is a build-time concern. Is NanoBSD split into a build and install phase like buildworld/installworld? If so, can you try the equivalent of 'make buildworld && make -DNO_CXX installworld'? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050620173016.GB93634>