Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 19:40:58 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: Verbose babble in if_fddisubr.c Message-ID: <199610311840.TAA16551@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <6078.846772188@critter.tfs.com> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Oct 31, 96 03:29:48 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >The author of `bootverbose' told me that it was a general flag when I > >objected to using it for controlling the slice messages. Ah, ISTR. > So: FDDI should have a sysctl: > > net.fddi.verbose > > or similar, possibly two different ones... Overkill. There's not much use in adding YASV for each printf in the kernel. (Yet Another Sysctl Variable) I vote for adding a sysctl variable for bootverbose, so it can be turned off later. I would hide the printf's in question behind bootverbose then. (Heck, i didn't even remember an open PR for it, but FDDI was never of my interest before...) Anybody objecting against these changes? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610311840.TAA16551>