Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:45:53 -0400 From: Michael Joyner <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting some daemons out of the base system Message-ID: <1035675953.3dbb293141b3d@imp.hq.dyns.cx> In-Reply-To: <3D9BF56A00005F55@cpfe1.be.tisc.dk> References: <3D9BF56A00005F55@cpfe1.be.tisc.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting dslb@tiscali.dk: > >-- Original Message -- > >Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:31:06 -0400 > >From: Michael Joyner <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx> > > >If we were to say move to a more modular styled base system, > >we shouldn't have to REMOVE the daemons, simply have them > >either easy to [x] check or [ ] uncheck as part of the installation > >process. Or have a custom base installation option. Or minimial base > >installation (ie no ISDN tools) . > > Well as long as I can chose NOT to install sendmail, I'll be happy. But > I don't see the difference between having sendmail removed and having to > select it. We select all the ports we want, why not just make sendmail > another > port (like qmail)? Because people like me DEPEND on certain options as part of the base system. Sendmail is just one of those many options. Besides which, asking to have sendmail removed is asking to much. (IMHO) Whereas having an option to not have installed as part of the base system seems more digestable. :) > > br > socketd > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- FreeBSD System Administrator http://manhattan.hq.dyns.cx/ ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1035675953.3dbb293141b3d>