Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:47:35 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSH in the base (was Re: OpenSSL update) Message-ID: <19991216214735.J62815@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <19991216202404.92CBA1CC6@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from peter@netplex.com.au on Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 04:24:04AM %2B0800 References: <green@FreeBSD.org> <19991216202404.92CBA1CC6@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 04:24:04AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > It's not a crypto export problem, it's the RSA patent that's the problem. > Any code that isn't RSAREF based for RSA support is unusable in the US. I > don't think OpenSSL linked against RSAREF is useable for OpenSSH. You think wrong. (OpenSSL linked against RSAREF is what OpenBSD use to be able to export OpenSSH to the US, which I assume mean it is usable.) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991216214735.J62815>