Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 May 1998 07:08:41 -0700
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Proxy ARP, routing, RFC1027 and the BSD TCP/IP stack 
Message-ID:  <199805111408.HAA07452@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 May 1998 14:43:31 %2B0200." <H000057c015774ac@MHS> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     The RFC 1027 introduces the use of Proxy ARP to enable old machines 
>     without subnetting to use routers (a router automatically answers the 
>     ARP requests from the old machine for IP addresses outside the local 
>     net). It seems CISCO routers implement the RFC (default behaviour).
>     
>     I would like to use a FreeBSD machine as such an "automated" Proxy ARP 
>     to use it as a gateway for a machine with a *very* limited stack 
>     (using the RTC real-time kernel).
>     
>     This RFC specifically mentions patches to the TCP/IP stack (for 
>     BSD43). But the RFC is old (Oct . 87). I've attempted a quick search 
>     on Internet, but without success.
>     
>     Has someone kept a copy of the indicated patches ?

   You should be able to get the behavior you're looking for in FreeBSD with
the "ARP_PROXYALL" kernel option. I use it here myself on my gateway router.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805111408.HAA07452>