Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:28:40 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: squid 3.5 plans Message-ID: <20150221082840.1c4d0571@efreet> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BQLa9BcmB=zJbr%2BAB9bRqm%2BT0GJtZrXK92VWEzZA3D16XPuaQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKOb=YZEe05JLa3SwAdFsttWW1u8LfzYRF_zOG5_heCTnyoseA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BQLa9DrfyKWhH3-eTiNCSfLFsZHGrOr=vgoHSziFFyDhx3G-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOb=Ybr5EDg5wEEGVvcrYhkfnE9L-9U8G7ztZ6Y-dXZd7YPnA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BQLa9BcmB=zJbr%2BAB9bRqm%2BT0GJtZrXK92VWEzZA3D16XPuaQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:23:15 -0500 Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com> wrote: > That is true. It looks like an update to both 3.5 and 3.4 were > released on the same day. How about dropping www/squid33 and creating > a www/squid34 port. Then updating the www/squid port to 3.5.2. I would say this is a bad idea, as squid 3.5 does not work on FreeBSD 10.1 with GENERIC kernel. Furthermore, it won't be fixed with binary patches (ie. until 10.2 or 11.0). I think www/squid should be recommended squid version for FreeBSD users. It wouldn't be appropriate to recommend version which does not work without recompiling kernel. We discussed it not so long ago: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=3Dfreebsd-ports@freebsd.org&q=3Dsubje= ct:%22Re%3A+www%2Fsquid+does+not+shutdown+via+rc%22&o=3Dnewest --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150221082840.1c4d0571>