Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Nov 1999 17:02:59 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>, peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD security auditing project. 
Message-ID:  <3778.943405379@localhost>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:26:26 PST." <19991123142626.D49964@dragon.nuxi.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This means nothing out of context.  I hope we don't go on a witch hunt.

No, but there is some merit to simply replacing these so that they
don't show up on our radar later.  I don't see any reason, for
example, why anyone should still be using gets() and our
implementation even gets whiney about it if you do.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3778.943405379>