Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 09:09:40 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Cc: thorpej@nas.nasa.gov Subject: Re: Q:Meanings of kern.securelevel values Message-ID: <199608080709.JAA16954@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199608080000.RAA10273@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> from Jason Thorpe at "Aug 7, 96 05:00:32 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jason Thorpe wrote: > > option INSECURE > > FWIW, NetBSD has this option. What other problems did you encounter in raising the securelevel, except the known problem with the video frame buffer vs. Xserver access through /dev/mem? Should one expect many problems, or only a few minor ones? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608080709.JAA16954>