Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 16:35:28 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a better idea for package dependencies Message-ID: <20000509163528.A66967@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091659260.11996-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>; from bsdx@looksharp.net on Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:01:02PM -0400 References: <20000509123637.A66034@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091659260.11996-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:01:02PM -0400, Adam wrote: > Since you claim superior knowledge about ports than me, I wont bother > explaining it. I'm only trying to satisfy your original question. > > " IF the pkg_* utils were ports, how would you install them??" I said that to make you think *WHY* pkg_* is in /usr/src and not /usr/ports, even though I said pkg_* issues are purely a ports issue. Geez. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000509163528.A66967>