Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:25:36 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: "Brian A. Seklecki" <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - difference? Message-ID: <1179501936.1234.3.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1179500233.41472.220.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <20070518090435.GB17241@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <1179500233.41472.220.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:57 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:04 +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > to UDMA33. I figure, they can safely be ignored? >=20 >=20 > Only if there isn't some massive performance degradation. =20 > ports/benchmarks/bonie++ can tell you that. =20 >=20 > As for the boot loader and your gmirror volumes; it's hard to say. It's > possible that there is some "absolute" or "non-relative" data in there > related to the device and the bus. >=20 > Also: Maybe the geometry of the devices changes between modes? >=20 > Send us the comparable dmesg(8) in both modes? >=20 > ~BAS >=20 On my Intel ICH7 based laptop, switching from SATA/PATA emulation to SATA native mode changes the device of my HD from ad0 to ad4.=20 YMMV --=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGTcVslcRvFfyds/cRAtkkAKCuDdWbnNtFJ1QLysB+v4zMe2P6GgCfdv+B HN3uFs6pdTpZ0tldwdX9twM= =07CB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1179501936.1234.3.camel>