Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:43:20 -0700
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer
Message-ID:  <7D8ACD5C-821D-4505-82E4-02267A7BA4F8@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130411201805.GD76816@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20130411201805.GD76816@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Lack of maintainer in a near future would lead to bitrot due to =
changes
> in other areas of network stack, kernel APIs, etc. This already =
happens,
> many changes during 10.0-CURRENT cycle were only compile tested wrt
> ipfilter. If we fail to find maintainer, then a correct decision would =
be
> to remove ipfilter(4) from the base system before 10.0-RELEASE.

This has been discussed in the past. Every time someone came up and said =
"I'm still using ipfilter!" and the idea to remove it dies with it.=20
I've been saying we should remove it for 4 years now. Not only it's =
outdated but it also doesn't not fit well in the FreeBSD roadmap. Then =
there's the question of maintainability. We gave the author a commit bit =
so that he could maintain it. That doesn't happen anymore and it sounds =
like he has since moved away from FreeBSD. I cannot find any reason to =
burden another FreeBSD developer with maintaining ipfilter.

--
Rui Paulo




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7D8ACD5C-821D-4505-82E4-02267A7BA4F8>