Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:56:42 -0400 From: "John Straiton" <jks@clickcom.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Problems with patch & ruby port - "File to patch:" Message-ID: <004b01c21e0c$63a4a2d0$fe16c60a@win2k.clickcom.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greets! We have a number of FreeBSD machines that all share a NFS mounted /usr/ports. In order to upgrade all the machines' copies of apache, I've been trying to use portupgrade. Out of 7 machines, all of them were able to install portupgrade except 2. On two of them, while it's compiling /usr/ports/lang/ruby as a dependency to portupgrade, it gets to the "Applying distribution patches for ruby-1.6.7.2002.05.23" and then prompts me "File to patch:" Now one of the machines that failed is a 4.6-RC machine, the other is a 4.4-R. Both report version 2.1 when I "patch -v". What's odd is that so do the machines that were able to compile it. So my idea was to have one of the machines that can build it, do just that, and then just do a "make install" on the machine that needed it (remember, they all share /usr/ports). Well that doesn't work because it tries to patch again and throws a Patch: **** imsordered hunks! Output would be garbled Thoughts? Help? John Straiton jks@clickcom.com Clickcom, Inc 704-365-9970x101 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004b01c21e0c$63a4a2d0$fe16c60a>