Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:42:44 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org>
To:        Duncan Barclay <dmlb@dmlb.org>
Cc:        <mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Lucent Wavelan and 4.2 works like a charm.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101050837510.10169-100000@moaner.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010105163134.dmlb@computer.my.domain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Duncan Barclay wrote:

> Firstly, the Prism driver will not support Raylink cards. The raylink
> cards do not use an Intersil chipset - they use a Raytheon one (and

I'm well aware Intersil isn't the only kid on the block.

> it's a lot harder to program - if_ray.c has 3650 lines, if_wi.c has
> 1599!). Oh, you probably meant a generic 802.11 layer.

Word, correct.  Rolling ifconfig to replace an/wi/raycontrol is a start.
I imagine one day maybe the merge of an/wi/awi will follow, *shrug*.

> I do agree it's messy. There are no APs that will talk to the V4 raylink
> cards. I don't think the firmware does infrastructure mode.

Oh really, so why do people buy them? ;)

> Any ideas on how not to violate POLA for V4 raylink owners?

Man page in bold & display firmware version (and possible warning) with
raycontrol.

--
Matt Peterson         another.geek.without.a.life
matt@peterson.org       http://matt.peterson.org/
-------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0101050837510.10169-100000>